Conspiracy Theories and the Internet: Controlled Demolition and Arrested Development

Episteme 4 (2):167-180 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Following Clarke (2002), a Lakatosian approach is used to account for the epistemic development of conspiracy theories. It is then argued that the hypercritical atmosphere of the internet has slowed down the development of conspiracy theories, discouraging conspiracy theorists from articulating explicit versions of their favoured theories, which could form the hard core of Lakatosian research pro grammes. The argument is illustrated with a study of the “controlled demolition” theory of the collapse of three towers at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Conspiracy Theories.Marc Pauly - 2020 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On Some Moral Costs of Conspiracy Theorizing.Patrick Stokes - 2018 - In Matthew R. X. Dentith, Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously. Rowman & Littlefield International. pp. 189-202.
Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing.Steve Clarke - 2002 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 32 (2):131-150.
Conspiracy Theories, Populism, and Epistemic Autonomy.Keith Raymond Harris - 2023 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 9 (1):21-36.
Investigating conspiracy theories – introduction to the special issue.M. R. X. Dentith, Julia Duetz & Melina Tsapos - 2025 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 68 (8):2589-2597.
Weaponizing Conspiracy Theories.Chris Ranalli - forthcoming - In Mihaela Popa-Wyatt, Misinformation and Other Epistemic Pathologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
569 (#98,280)

6 months
58 (#153,087)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Steve Clarke
Charles Sturt University

Citations of this work

Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures.Cass R. Sunstein & Adrian Vermeule - 2008 - Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (2):202-227.
What's Epistemically Wrong with Conspiracy Theorising?Keith Harris - 2018 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84:235-257.
When conspiracy theorists win.Steve Clarke - 2025 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 68 (8):2841-2864.

View all 26 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.Thomas Samuel Kuhn - 1962 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Otto Neurath.
Criticism and the growth of knowledge.Imre Lakatos & Alan Musgrave (eds.) - 1970 - Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press.
Of conspiracy theories.Brian Keeley - 1999 - Journal of Philosophy 96 (3):109-126.
Popper revisited, or what is wrong with conspiracy theories?Charles Pigden - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (1):3-34.
Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories.David Coady - 2003 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):197-209.

View all 9 references / Add more references