Epistemic Normativity and Cognitive Agency

Noûs 52 (3):508-529 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On the assumption that genuinely normative demands concern things connected in some way to our agency, i.e. what we exercise in doing things with or for reasons, epistemologists face an important question: are there genuine epistemic norms governing belief, and if so where in the vicinity of belief are we to find the requisite cognitive agency? Extant accounts of cognitive agency tend to focus on belief itself or the event of belief-formation to answer this question, to the exclusion of the activity of maintaining a system of beliefs. This paper argues that a full account of epistemic normativity will need to make sense of this activity as a core locus of cognitive agency. This idea is used to motivate the conclusion that one important and often overlooked kind of epistemic norms is the kind of norms governing the various cognitive activities by which we check, sustain, and adjust our belief systems.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A Case for Epistemic Agency.Dustin Olson - 2015 - Logos and Episteme 6 (4):449-474.
Can the aim of belief ground epistemic normativity?Charles Côté-Bouchard - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (12):3181-3198.
The Structure of Cognitive Agency.Daniel Breyer - 2016 - Acta Analytica 31 (3):285-296.
Biological Function and Epistemic Normativity.Ema Sullivan-Bissett - 2017 - Philosophical Explorations 20 (1):94-110.
Agency of belief and intention.A. K. Flowerree - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):2763-2784.
Epistemic value and virtue epistemology.Tsung-Hsing Ho - 2015 - Dissertation, University of Southampton
Epistemic instrumentalism, permissibility, and reasons for belief.Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen - 2018 - In Conor McHugh, Jonathan Way & Daniel Whiting, Normativity: Epistemic and Practical. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 260-280.
Epistemic agency: Some doubts.Kieran Setiya - 2013 - Philosophical Issues 23 (1):179-198.
Richard Rorty and Epistemic Normativity.Eric T. Kerr & J. Adam Carter - 2016 - Social Epistemology 30 (1):3-24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-24

Downloads
430 (#116,853)

6 months
48 (#173,701)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Matthew Chrisman
University of Edinburgh

Citations of this work

Epistemic blame.Cameron Boult - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (8):e12762.
What’s so bad about echo chambers?Christopher Ranalli & Finlay Malcolm - 2025 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 68 (10):3984-4026.
On believing indirectly for practical reasons.Sebastian Schmidt - 2022 - Philosophical Studies 179 (6):1795-1819.
Normative Alethic Pluralism.Filippo Ferrari - 2018 - In Jeremy Wyatt, Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Nathan Kellen, Pluralisms in Truth and Logic. Cham, Switzerland and Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Springer Verlag. pp. 145-168.

View all 32 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Quotation.Herman Cappelen, Ernest Lepore & Matthew McKeever - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Knowledge in a social world.Alvin I. Goldman - 1991 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Judgment and agency.Ernest Sosa - 2015 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Knowledge in a Social World.Alvin I. Goldman - 1999 - Oxford, GB: Clarendon Press.

View all 70 references / Add more references