On the strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs

Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (1):1-55 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We study the proof-theoretic strength and effective content of the infinite form of Ramsey's theorem for pairs. Let RT n k denote Ramsey's theorem for k-colorings of n-element sets, and let RT $^n_{ denote (∀ k)RT n k. Our main result on computability is: For any n ≥ 2 and any computable (recursive) k-coloring of the n-element sets of natural numbers, there is an infinite homogeneous set X with X'' ≤ T 0 (n). Let IΣ n and BΣ n denote the Σ n induction and bounding schemes, respectively. Adapting the case n = 2 of the above result (where X is low 2 ) to models of arithmetic enables us to show that RCA 0 + IΣ 2 + RT 2 2 is conservative over RCA 0 + IΣ 2 for Π 1 1 statements and that $RCA_0 + I\Sigma_3 + RT^2_{, is Π 1 1 -conservative over RCA 0 + IΣ 3. It follows that RCA 0 + RT 2 2 does not imply BΣ 3. In contrast, J. Hirst showed that $RCA_0 + RT^2_{ does imply BΣ 3, and we include a proof of a slightly strengthened version of this result. It follows that $RT^2_{ is strictly stronger than RT 2 2 over RCA 0.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

On some formalized conservation results in arithmetic.P. Clote, P. Hájek & J. Paris - 1990 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 30 (4):201-218.
RT₂² does not imply WKL₀.Jiayi Liu - 2012 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 77 (2):609-620.
Generalized cohesiveness.Tamara Hummel & Carl Jockusch - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):489-516.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
416 (#118,933)

6 months
55 (#159,958)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Open questions in reverse mathematics.Antonio Montalbán - 2011 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 17 (3):431-454.
Forcing in proof theory.Jeremy Avigad - 2004 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 10 (3):305-333.

View all 56 citations / Add more citations