Three Skeptics and the Critique: Review of Michael Forster's Kant and Skepticism

Philosophical Books 51 (4):228-244 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A long critical notice of Michael Forster's recent book, "Kant and Skepticism." We argue that Forster's characterization of Kant's response to skepticism is both textually dubious and philosophically flawed. -/-.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Greek skepticism; a study in epistemology.Charlotte L. Stough - 1969 - Berkeley,: University of California Press.
Pyrrhonian skepticism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.) - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Contemporary skepticism.Duncan Pritchard - 2004 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Skeptics Can Win (But Almost Never Will).Timothy Pickavance - 2011 - Philosophical Papers 40 (3):371-394.
The impossibility of local skepticism.Stephen Maitzen - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):453-464.
Kant's response to skepticism.Robert Stern - 2008 - In John Greco, The Oxford handbook of skepticism. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 265.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-14

Downloads
1,428 (#30,445)

6 months
232 (#38,712)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

References found in this work

Quotation.Herman Cappelen, Ernest Lepore & Matthew McKeever - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more references