Civil disobedience, conscientious objection, and evasive noncompliance: A framework for the analysis and assessment of illegal actions in health care

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (1):63-84 (1985)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay explores some of the conceptual and moral issues raised by illegal actions in health care. The author first identifies several types of illegal action, concentrating on civil disobedience, conscientious objection or refusal, and evasive noncompliance. Then he sketches a framework for the moral justification of these types of illegal action. Finally, he applies the conceptual and normative frameworks to several major cases of illegal action in health care, such as "mercy killing" and some decisions not to treat incompetent patients. Keywords: illegal actions, mercy killing, non-treatment of incompetent patients, civil disobedience, conscientious objection, evasive non-compliance, moral justification and disobedience, dissent in health care CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-16

Downloads
186 (#217,928)

6 months
58 (#153,087)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Two concepts of rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.
P.Werner Ziegenfuss & Gertrud Jung - 1978 - In Werner Ziegenfuss & Gertrud Jung, L - Z. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 244-318.
On civil disobedience.Hugo A. Bedau - 1961 - Journal of Philosophy 58 (21):653-665.

View all 11 references / Add more references