Moral autonomy, civil liberties, and confucianism

Philosophy East and West 52 (3):281-310 (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Three claims are defended. (1) There is a conception of moral autonomy in Confucian ethics that to a degree can support toleration and freedom. However, (2) Confucian moral autonomy is different from personal autonomy, and the latter gives a stronger justification for civil and personal liberties than does the former. (3) The contemporary appeal of Confucianism would be strengthened by including personal autonomy, and this need not be seen as forsaking Confucian ethics but rather as an internal revision in response to new social circumstances. From this inclusion emerges a new theory of liberties that recognizes the value of personal autonomy and the importance of the ethical good that liberties instrumentally serve to promote.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Kant's Conception of Personal Autonomy.Paul Formosa - 2013 - Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (3):193-212.
The Problem of Autonomy in Confucian Ethics.Yu-yu Liu - 2006 - Modern Philosophy 6:105-111.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
695 (#83,573)

6 months
56 (#157,995)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joseph Chan
University of Hong Kong

Citations of this work

Confucian Social Media: An Oxymoron?Pak-Hang Wong - 2013 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12 (3):283-296.
Xunzi on Moral Expertise.Justin Tiwald - 2012 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (3):275-293.
A Confucian Conception of Critical Thinking.Charlene Tan - 2017 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 51 (1):331-343.

View all 32 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references