- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Galileo's telescopic observations of Venus and Mars
British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 36 (2):175-184 (1985)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Review of Alan Francis Chalmers: What is this Thing Called Science?: An Assessment of the Nature and Status of Science and Its Methods. [REVIEW]Gunnar Andersson - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):389-392.
Replication or Monopoly? The Economies of Invention and Discovery in Galileo's Observations of 1610.Mario Biagioli - 2000 - Science in Context 13 (3-4):547-590.
Galileo on the Telescope and the Eye.Harold I. Brown - 1985 - Journal of the History of Ideas 46 (4):487-501.
Alan Chalmers, The Scientist's Atom and the Philosopher's Stone: How Science Succeeded and Philosophy Failed to Gain Knowledge of Atoms. Heidelberg, London and New York: Springer, 2009. Pp xii+287. ISBN 978-90-481-2361-2. £90.00. [REVIEW]Seth Suman - 2011 - British Journal for the History of Science 44 (3):463-465.
Alan Chalmers. Science and its Fabrication. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1990. Pp. xii + 142. ISBN 0-335-09318-3, £22.50 ; ISBN 0-335-09317-5, £6.99.Stephen Sturdy - 1991 - British Journal for the History of Science 24 (1):128-128.
Experiences and the Bible in Galileo’s Letter to Castelli.Matjaž Vesel - 2015 - Teorie Vědy / Theory of Science 37 (2):123-158.
Science and Its Fabrication. By Alan Chalmers. [REVIEW]Robert C. Trundle - 1991 - Modern Schoolman 68 (4):331-333.
The initial response to Galileo's lunar observations.Roger Ariew - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 32 (3):571-581.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
267 (#157,408)
6 months
37 (#233,669)
2009-01-28
Downloads
267 (#157,408)
6 months
37 (#233,669)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The epistemological status of the direct and indirect observation distinction.Sarwar Ahmed - 2025 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 15 (68):1-28.
The power of ARCHED hypotheses: Feyerabend's Galileo as a closet rationalist.Neil Thomason - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (1):255-264.
On the Telescopic Disks of Stars: A Review and Analysis of Stellar Observations from the Early Seventeenth through the Middle Nineteenth Centuries.Christopher M. Graney & Timothy P. Grayson - 2011 - Annals of Science 68 (3):351-373.
La crítica de Paul Karl Feyerabend al modelo neo-positivista del significado.María Teresa Gargiulo de Vázquez - 2014 - Arbor 190 (769):a168.
References found in this work
The Copernican Revolution: Planetary Astronomy in the Development of Western Thought.Thomas S. Kuhn - 1957 - Harvard University Press.
Objective Knowledge.K. R. Popper - 1972 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 4 (2):388-398.
Science in a Free Society.Paul Feyerabend - 1978 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 169 (4):448-451.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation