Brutal identity

In Stuart Brock & Anthony Everett, Fictional Objects. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 174-207 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter defends a view according to which the identity and distinctness of fictional characters is, in a sense that they explain, brute. The authors compare this view with two of its rivals, which are due to Terence Parsons, on the one hand, and to Benjamin Schnieder and Tatjana von Solodkoff, on the other. A common objection to the view defended here is that it leads to an unacceptable arbitrariness about how many fictional characters there are. But the chapter argues that, at least as far as arbitrariness is concerned, there is no reason to reject the view in favor of either of its rivals.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-16

Downloads
46 (#1,256,140)

6 months
38 (#219,343)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Cathleen Muller
Marist College
Ben Caplan
University of Kansas

Citations of this work

Abstract Creationism and Authorial Intention.David Friedell - 2016 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (2):129-137.
Creating abstract objects.David Friedell - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (10):e12783.
Fiction and indeterminate identity.David Friedell - 2020 - Analysis 80 (2):221-229.
Speaking of Godot: Fiction, Reference, and Indeterminate Identities.Peter Alward - 2024 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 82 (2):163-173.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references