What the ‘greater good’ excludes: Patients left behind by pre‐operative COVID‐19 screening in an Ethiopian town

Developing World Bioethics 23 (3):269-276 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic, bioethical analyses often emphasized population health and societal benefit. Hospital policies frequently focused on reducing risk of transmitting SARS‐CoV‐2 by restricting visitors; requiring protective equipment; and screening staff, patients and visitors. While restrictions can be burdensome, they are often justified as essential measures to protect the whole population against a virus with high rates of transmission, morbidity and mortality. Yet communities are not monolithic, and the impacts of these restrictions affect different groups differently. An ophthalmological unit outreach program in Ethiopia serves to illustrate. Pre‐operative screening policies were designed to protect as many patients as possible but had adverse impacts on underserved communities. As this case study demonstrates, creating hospital policies that truly serve the good of the society may require a more holistic review of impacts on inequitably positioned communities.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Restricted Patient Rights and Autonomy in the Face of COVID-19.Mercury Shitindo - 2024 - In Lillian Omutoko & Walter Jaoko, Bioethics from the Global South. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 39-62.
Health disparities from pandemic policies: reply to critics.Nancy S. Jecker - 2023 - Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (5):348-349.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-05-23

Downloads
99 (#520,439)

6 months
16 (#751,944)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations