Self-referential probability

Dissertation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This thesis focuses on expressively rich languages that can formalise talk about probability. These languages have sentences that say something about probabilities of probabilities, but also sentences that say something about the probability of themselves. For example: (π): “The probability of the sentence labelled π is not greater than 1/2.” Such sentences lead to philosophical and technical challenges; but can be useful. For example they bear a close connection to situations where ones confidence in something can affect whether it is the case or not. The motivating interpretation of probability as an agent's degrees of belief will be focused on throughout the thesis. This thesis aims to answer two questions relevant to such frameworks, which correspond to the two parts of the thesis: “How can one develop a formal semantics for this framework?” and “What rational constraints are there on an agent once such expressive frameworks are considered?”.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Chance and Probability.Stephen Turner - 2007 - In G. Ritzer, J. M. Ryan & B. Thorn, The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (1st Ed.). Wiley. pp. 425-426.
433Epistemic Dilemmas, Undermining Scenarios and Determinate Recommendations.Nick Hughes - 2026 - In Essays on Epistemic Dilemmas. Oxford United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the): Oxford University Press.
Bernoulli Semantics and Ordinal Semantics for Conditionals.Stefan Kaufmann - 2023 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 52 (1):199-220.
Interpreting Imprecise Probabilities.Nicholas J. J. Smith - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly.
Statistical and Inductive Probabilities.H. T. R. - 1964 - Review of Metaphysics 18 (1):179-179.
The Idea of Rational Probability.Ralph Wedgwood - 2023 - In Rationality and Belief. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 191-210.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-16

Downloads
1,170 (#43,058)

6 months
226 (#45,625)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Catrin Campbell-Moore
University of Bristol

Citations of this work

Rational Polarization.Kevin Dorst - 2023 - Philosophical Review 132 (3):355-458.
Higher-Order Evidence.Kevin Dorst - 2023 - In Maria Lasonen-Aarnio & Clayton Littlejohn, The Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Evidence. New York, NY: Routledge. pp. 176-194.
Epistemic Dilemmas, Undermining Scenarios and Determinate Recommendations.Catrin Campbell-Moore - 2026 - In Nick Hughes, Essays on Epistemic Dilemmas. Oxford United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the): Oxford University Press.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Accuracy and the Laws of Credence.Richard Pettigrew - 2016 - New York, NY.: Oxford University Press UK.
Outline of a theory of truth.Saul Kripke - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):690-716.
The Foundations of Mathematics and Other Logical Essays.Frank Plumpton Ramsey - 1925 - London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Edited by R. B. Braithwaite.
Humean Supervenience Debugged.David Lewis - 1994 - Mind 103 (412):473--490.

View all 47 references / Add more references