Two undecidable questions about group actions

Abstract

It is shown that for invariance under the action of special groups the statements "Every invariant PCA is decomposable into (1 invariant Borel sets" and "Every pair of invariant PCA is reducible by a pair of invariant PCA sets" are independent of the axioms of set theory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

An invariance notion in recursion theory.Robert E. Byerly - 1982 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 47 (1):48-66.
Topics in invariant descriptive set theory.Howard Becker - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 111 (3):145-184.
Definability of groups in ℵ₀-stable metric structures.Itaï Yaacov - 2010 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 75 (3):817-840.
On universal semiregular invariant measures.Piotr Zakrzewski - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (4):1170-1176.
A note on the non‐forking‐instances topology.Ziv Shami - 2020 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 66 (3):336-340.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-12

Downloads
12 (#2,019,602)

6 months
12 (#966,368)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Burgess
University of Western Australia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references