Plus Maze experiments and the boundary conditions of the dynamic field model

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):35-36 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the dynamic field model, parametric variations of the same general processes predict how infants reach for a goal. Animal learning investigators argue that locating a goal is the product of qualitatively different mechanisms (response learning and place learning) Response versus place learning experiments suggest limitations to the dynamic field model hut where those limitations begin or end is unclear.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Place versus response learning in the simple T-maze.Hugh C. Blodgett & Kenneth McCutchan - 1947 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (5):412.
Extending the model: Pavlovian social learning.Dorothy M. Fragaszy - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (2):255-256.
Experimental comparisons of observational learning mechanisms for movement imitation in mobile robots.Joe Saunders, Chrystopher L. Nehaniv & Kerstin Dautenhahn - 2007 - Interaction Studies. Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies / Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systemsinteraction Studies 8 (2):307-335.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
56 (#1,071,669)

6 months
7 (#1,397,756)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references