Abstract

Many of those who defend the idea that intuitions provide immediate justification take intuitions to be seemings or experiences of a certain kind, and model the immediate justification provided by intuition on the immediate justification provided by perceptual experience. However, this view of intuition is controversial. Instead, I show how the thesis of immediacy can be developed and defended on a wide range of different views of intuition. Thus the thesis that intuition provides immediate justification is not hostage to the controversial view that intuitions are seemings or experiences.