Violations of sensorimotor theories of visual experience

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):904-905 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Although the sensorimotor account is a significant step forward, it cannot explain experiences of entoptic phenomena that violate normal sensorimotor contingencies but nonetheless are perceived as visual. Nervous system structure limits how they can be interpreted. Neurophysiology, combined with a sensorimotor theory, can account for space constancy by denying the existence of permanent representations of states that must be corrected or updated.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

The world as an inside working memory.Naoyuki Osaka - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):905-906.
Neuroanatomy and function in two visual systems.Bruce Bridgeman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):535-536.
Mirror neurons: A sensorimotor representation system.Vittorio Gallese & Christian Keysers - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):983-984.
Whither visual representations? Whither qualia?Jonathan Cohen - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):980-981.
Sensorimotor Laws, Mechanisms, and Representations.Alfredo Vernazzani - 2014 - Proceedings of the 36th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
Still room for representations.Robert Van Gulick - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):1007-1008.
Must all action halt during sensorimotor mismatch?Daniel M. Merfeld - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (1):189-190.
A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.J. Kevin O’Regan & Alva Noë - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):883-917.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
112 (#431,316)

6 months
15 (#809,700)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references