Elaine Scarry, Michael Haneke’s Funny Games and the Structure of Cruelty

Body and Society 25 (3):136-152 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Haneke’s film Funny Games is a reflection on the nature of pain and representation. I argue that the film closely follows Elaine Scarry’s arguments about the structure of torture. Further, by refusing to appeal to categories of generalization such as ‘sadism’ and ‘psychopathy’, Haneke undermines the process of finding meaning in violence. Haneke positions his audiences as more than just witnesses to torture, but active participants in cruelty.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-24

Downloads
74 (#790,846)

6 months
5 (#1,607,410)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

S.Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin - 2015 - In Marcus Willaschek, Jürgen Stolzenberg, Georg Mohr & Stefano Bacin, Kant-Lexikon. Berlin: De Gruyter. pp. 1995-2243.
S. - 2008 - In A. P. Martinich, A Hobbes Dictionary. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 269-298.
Dialectic of enlightenment: philosophical fragments.Max Horkheimer - 2002 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Theodor W. Adorno & Gunzelin Schmid Noerr.
Dialectic of Enlightenment.Max Horkheimer & Theodor Adorno - 2002 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press. Edited by Gunzelin Noeri.
The theory of moral sentiments.Adam Smith - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Knud Haakonssen.

View all 13 references / Add more references