The Moral Turing Test: a defense

Philosophy and Technology 37 (3):1-13 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I raise the question whether an artificial intelligence can act morally. I first sketch and defend a general picture of what is at stake in this question. I then sketch and defend a behavioral test, known as the Moral Turing Test, as a good sufficiency test for an artificial intelligence acting morally. I end by discussing some general anticipated objections.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-08-29

Downloads
75 (#776,053)

6 months
18 (#649,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Einar Duenger Bohn
University Of Agder

Citations of this work

Turing’s Test vs the Moral Turing Test.Diane Proudfoot - 2024 - Philosophy and Technology 37 (4):1-14.
Turing's Test vs the Moral Turing Test.Diane Proudfoot - 2024 - Philosophy and Technology 37 (4):1-14.
In Defense of the Moral Turing Test: A Reply.Einar Duenger Bohn - 2025 - Philosophy and Technology 38 (2):1-3.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Minds, brains, and programs.John Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
The philosophy of information.Luciano Floridi - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The ethics of information.Luciano Floridi - 2015 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press UK.
Moral Machines: Teaching Robots Right From Wrong.Wendell Wallach & Colin Allen - 2008 - New York, US: Oxford University Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references