Intuitionistic Logic according to Dijkstra's Calculus of Equational Deduction

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 49 (4):361-384 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Dijkstra and Scholten have proposed a formalization of classical predicate logic on a novel deductive system as an alternative to Hilbert's style of proof and Gentzen's deductive systems. In this context we call it CED (Calculus of Equational Deduction). This deductive method promotes logical equivalence over implication and shows that there are easy ways to prove predicate formulas without the introduction of hypotheses or metamathematical tools such as the deduction theorem. Moreover, syntactic considerations (in Dijkstra's words, "letting the symbols do the work") have led to the "calculational style," an impressive array of techniques for elegant proof constructions. In this paper, we formalize intuitionistic predicate logic according to CED with similar success. In this system (I-CED), we prove Leibniz's principle for intuitionistic logic and also prove that any (intuitionistic) valid formula of predicate logic can be proved in I-CED.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Axiomatic calculi.Paolo Mancosu, Sergio Galvan & Richard Zach - 2021 - In Paolo Mancosu, Sergio Galvan & Richard Zach, An Introduction to Proof Theory: Normalization, Cut-Elimination, and Consistency Proofs. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 13-64.
On calculational proofs.Vladimir Lifschitz - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 113 (1-3):207-224.
Intuitionistic system without contraction.G. Dardzania - 1977 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 6 (1):2-6.
Unified Natural Deduction for Logics of Strong Negation.Norihiro Kamide & Sara Negri - 2025 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 66 (4):543-580.
A proof-theoretic investigation of a logic of positions.Stefano Baratella & Andrea Masini - 2003 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 123 (1-3):135-162.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
124 (#370,747)

6 months
15 (#807,222)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

On calculational proofs.Vladimir Lifschitz - 2001 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 113 (1-3):207-224.

Add more references