The hodgkin‐huxley equations and the concrete model: Comments on Craver, Schaffner, and Weber

Philosophy of Science 75 (5):1034-1046 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I claim that the Hodgkin‐Huxley (HH) current equations owe a great deal of their importance to their role in bringing results from experiments on squid giant action preparations to bear on the study of the action potential in other neurons in other in vitro and in vivo environments. I consider ideas from Weber and Craver about the role of Coulomb’s and other fundamental equations in explaining the action potential and in HH’s development of their equations. Also, I offer an embellishment to Schaffner’s emergent unifier conception of the HH model. †To contact the author, please write to: Department of HPS, University of Pittsburgh, 1017 Cathedral of Learning, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; e‐mail: [email protected].

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

What was Hodgkin and Huxley’s Achievement?Arnon Levy - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (3):469-492.
The Dome: An Unexpectedly Simple Failure of Determinism.John D. Norton - 2008 - Philosophy of Science 75 (5):786-798.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
252 (#164,529)

6 months
31 (#285,230)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?