Reply to Steven Lukes

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):319 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Comments on the Papers of David Bloor and Steven Lukes.Mary Hesse - 1982 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):325.
Editorial Response to David Bloor.Gerd Buchdahl - 1982 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):299.
Comments on David Bloor.Steven Lukes - 1982 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 13 (4):313.
A Reply To David Bloor.John Worrall - 1979 - British Journal for the History of Science 12 (1):71-81.
Reply to Steven Yearley.Donald MacKenzie - 1983 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (3):251.
Primitive Classification and the Sociology of Knowledge: A Response to Bloor.Joseph Wayne Smith - 1983 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 15 (3):237.
Shahryari on Bloor and the Strong Program.Finn Collin - 2022 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 11 (3):70-76.
Concepts, anomalies and reality: a response to Bloor and Fehér.Stephen Kemp - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):241-253.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
66 (#906,296)

6 months
1 (#2,183,676)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Can relativism be reconciled with realism and causalism?Barbara Tuchańska - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (3):285 – 294.

Add more citations