Shared intentionality and attachment theories in WILD and WEIRD contexts

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 49:e261 (2026)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Barr et al.’s WILD approach to social-cognitive development appropriately identifies sampling shortcomings in Shared Intentionality and Attachment Theories. I argue these theories reflect evolved social-cognitive mechanisms that are expressed differently in different rearing environments and remain conceptual anchors for understanding important aspects of human social-cognitive development that should gain even more explanatory power with the addition of WILD data.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why not chimpanzees, lions, and hyenas too?Richard Schuster - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):716-717.
The ecological rationality of strategic cognition.Christophe Heintz - 2005 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (6):825-826.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-07-05

Downloads
1 (#2,388,608)

6 months
1 (#2,175,231)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references