Disrupting Liberal Democracy:The Phenomenal Rise of Duterte

Mabini Review 10 (2021):1-19 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The paper offers an explanation why Duterte won the election in 2016 and how his phenomenal rise can be accounted. Some scholars on Philippine politics attribute the rise of Duterte to the failure of liberal democracy. On the other hand, this paper argues that “failure of liberal democracy” explanation merely scratches the surface of the question and does not address the source of the failure. Gramsci’s notion of passive revolution this paper maintains point to the root of the failures of the liberal democratic regimes established after EDSA People Power revolt in 1986. The main contention of the paper is Duterte is a product of passive revolution. If Italy swung to fascism in the 1920s, this paper asserts Philippines in 2016 turned to Dutertismo.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Duterte: Philippines ’ Monstrous Leader?!Joseph Reylan Viray - 2019 - APCORE: Journal of Proceedings 1 (1):31-36.
The Political Vision of Contemporary Filipinos: A Ricoeurian Reading of Duterte's Popular Presidency.Alexis Deodato Itao - 2018 - Social Ethics Society Journal of Applied Philosophy 4 (Special Issue):121-160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-11-12

Downloads
412 (#119,684)

6 months
250 (#33,078)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Selections from the Prison Notebooks.Antonio Gramsci - 1971 - London: Lawrence and Wishart. Edited by Quintin Hoare & Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. Translated by Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith.

Add more references