How the Distinction between "Irreversible" and "Permanent" Illuminates Circulatory-Respiratory Death Determination

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (3):242-255 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The distinction between the "permanent" (will not reverse) and "irreversible" (cannot reverse) cessation of functions is critical to understand the meaning of a determination of death using circulatory–respiratory tests. Physicians determining death test only for the permanent cessation of circulation and respiration because they know that irreversible cessation follows rapidly and inevitably once circulation no longer will restore itself spontaneously and will not be restored medically. Although most statutes of death stipulate irreversible cessation of circulatory and respiratory functions, the accepted medical standard is their permanent cessation because permanence is a perfect surrogate indicator for irreversibility, and using it permits a more timely declaration. Therefore, patients properly declared dead in donation after circulatory death (DCD) protocols satisfy the requirements of death statutes and do not violate the dead donor rule. The acronym DCD should represent organ "donation after circulatory death" to clarify that the death standard is the permanent cessation of circulation, not heartbeat. Heart donation in DCD does not retroactively negate the donor's death determination because circulation has ceased permanently.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-07-27

Downloads
153 (#275,605)

6 months
31 (#298,472)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Dead Donor Rule.John A. Robertson - 1999 - Hastings Center Report 29 (6):6.
The metaphysics of brain death.Jeff Mcmahan - 1995 - Bioethics 9 (2):91–126.
Brain Death: Can It Be Resuscitated?D. Alan Shewmon - 2009 - Hastings Center Report 39 (2):18-24.

View all 26 references / Add more references