You Can Love a Robot, But Should You Fight With it?

In Janina Loh & Wulf Loh, Social Robotics and the Good Life: The Normative Side of Forming Emotional Bonds With Robots. Bielefeld: transcript Verlag. pp. 129-156 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There are several ways to look at technical objects and at human-machine interaction with regard to emotions and emotional bonding. Some research deals with machines’ ability to detect emotions in humans, some with a technical object’s options to signal emotions in a way understandable to living beings, some with how to alter human emotions with machinic help, some with the pragmatics or ethics of such endeavours. Philosophers, psychologists, and producers of machines may try to argue for or against the usefulness of technical objects ‘becoming emotional’ (i.e., to process signs of a living being’s emotions or produce signals of emotion understandable to living agents) and explore hypothetically and empirically the consequences of machinic emotion simulation. Social psychologists may study emotional attachment to or acceptancy of machines, designers may try to find ways to build technical objects according to the desired emotional impact on a human. All throughout this, discussions about human-machine relations often concentrate on positive emotions linked to the possibility of friendship, companionship, or human acceptance of machines. Where anger, hate, disappointment, indifference, or curiosity as a source of generally hostile or corrective behaviour towards technical systems are of concern this is often in a context of ‘robot abuse’ (Brscić et al. 2015), robot rights (Gunkel 2018), or in contexts in which authors argue that machines are morally considerable entities either in themselves (Ryland 2021), or, from a point of view of virtue ethics, because of the impact a human beings’ behaviour towards inanimate objects has on the human beings’ character (Coeckelbergh 2021, also cp. Ess in this volume). To add another perspective with regard to the question of how human beings relate to inanimate objects, in this contribution we will specifically analyse the merit of expressing frustration-related emotions towards technical systems in terms of aiming at the goal of a ‘good life’. To this end, we sketch how frustration expression is involved in other interactions (human-human, human-world), we theoretically grasp the frustration-related concepts of ‘trust’, cognitive and normative ‘expectation’ and refer to attributed autonomy along the way, analyse the usefulness of frustration-related emotion expression towards technical objects with and without sociosensitive and socioactive functions, and point to some arguments for and against the use of such functions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Emotions in (Human-Robot) Relation. Structuring Hybrid Social Ecologies.Luisa Damiano & Paul Dumouchel - 2023 - In Catrin Misselhorn, Tom Poljanšek, Tobias Störzinger & Maike Klein, Emotional Machines: Perspectives from Affective Computing and Emotional Human-Machine Interaction. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 61-82.
Emotion Components and Understanding in Humans and Machines.Jacqueline Bellon - 2023 - In Catrin Misselhorn, Tom Poljanšek, Tobias Störzinger & Maike Klein, Emotional Machines: Perspectives from Affective Computing and Emotional Human-Machine Interaction. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 21-59.
Emotional Machines—Introduction.Catrin Misselhorn, Tom Poljanšek & Tobias Störzinger - 2023 - In Catrin Misselhorn, Tom Poljanšek, Tobias Störzinger & Maike Klein, Emotional Machines: Perspectives from Affective Computing and Emotional Human-Machine Interaction. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. pp. 1-17.
Should We Develop Empathy for Social Robots?Jue Wang - 2021 - In Ruiping Fan & Mark J. Cherry, Sex Robots: Social Impact and the Future of Human Relations. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 41-55.
Helpless machines and true loving care givers: a feminist critique of recent trends in human‐robot interaction.Jutta Weber - 2005 - Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 3 (4):209-218.
Machine learning/natural language processing and emotions: Some ethical considerations.Václav Ježek - 2026 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 16 (3-4):137-145.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-17

Downloads
48 (#1,216,391)

6 months
14 (#871,543)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Tom Poljanšek
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Jacqueline Bellon
University Tübingen

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Thinking without words.José Luis Bermúdez - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Do artifacts have politics?Langdon Winner - 1980 - Daedalus 109 (1):121--136.
Intentional systems.Daniel C. Dennett - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (4):87-106.
The Metaphysics of Representation.J. Robert G. Williams - 2019 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.

View all 24 references / Add more references