Should medical students perform pelvic exams on anaesthetised patients without explicit consent?

Clinical Ethics 17 (3):230-234 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

There have been many reports of medical students performing pelvic exams on anaesthetised patients without the necessary consent being provided or even sought. These cases have led to an ongoing discussion regarding the need to ensure informed consent has been secured and furthermore, how it might be best obtained. We consider the importance of informed consent, the potential harm to both the patient and medical student risked by the suboptimal consent process, as well as alternatives to teaching pelvic examinations within medical school. The subsequent discussion focuses on whether medical students should perform pelvic examinations on anaesthetised patients without personally ensuring that they have given their explicit consent. Whilst we question the need to conduct pelvic examinations on anaesthetised patients in any circumstance, we argue that medical students should not perform such exams without personally securing the patients informed consent.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-09

Downloads
110 (#444,307)

6 months
40 (#206,647)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nathan Emmerich
Queen's University, Belfast (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations