Uncertainty about the value of quantum probability for cognitive modeling

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):279-280 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that the overly simplistic scenarios discussed by Pothos & Busemeyer (P&B) establish at best that quantum probability theory (QPT) is a logical possibility allowing distinct predictions from classical probability theory (CPT). The article fails, however, to provide convincing evidence for the proposal that QPT offers unique insights regarding cognition and the nature of human rationality.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Is quantum probability rational?Alasdair I. Houston & Karoline Wiesner - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):291 - 292.
Quantum probability, intuition, and human rationality.Mike Oaksford - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):303-303.
Physics envy: Trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.James Shanteau & David J. Weiss - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):306-307.
Quantum probability and conceptual combination in conjunctions.James A. Hampton - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):290 - 291.
What are the mechanics of quantum cognition?Daniel Joseph Navarro & Ian Fuss - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):299-300.
On the quantum principles of cognitive learning.Alexandre de Castro - 2013 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 36 (3):281-282.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-27

Downloads
70 (#846,138)

6 months
9 (#1,250,161)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Christina Behme
Mount Saint Vincent University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Add more references