Suicide and Voluntary Active Euthanasia: Why the Difference in Attitude?

Nursing Ethics 2 (2):161-170 (1995)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It appears that the attitudes of health professionals differ towards suicide and voluntary active euthanasia. An acceptance of, if not an agreement with, voluntary active eutha nasia exists, while there is a general consensus that suicide should be prevented. This paper searches for a working definition of suicide, to discover ethical reasons for the negative value that suicide assumes, and also to provide a term of reference when comparing suicide with euthanasia. On arriving at a working definition of suicide, it is compared with voluntary active euthanasia. An analysis of utilitarian and deontological considerations is provided and proves to be inconclusive with respect to the ethical principles informing the attitudes of professionals. Therefore, a search for other influences is attempted; this indicates that psychological influences inform attitudes to a greater degree than ethical principles.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-09

Downloads
100 (#513,469)

6 months
16 (#710,878)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Value of Life.John Harris - 1985 - Mind 95 (380):533-535.
The Value of Life: An Introduction to Medical Ethics.John Harris - 1985 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 49 (4):699-700.
Moral matters.Jan Narveson - 1993 - Peterborough, Ontario: Broadview Press.
Ending Lives.Michael J. Coughlan - 1988 - Philosophical Books 29 (4):234-235.
Moral Questions.John McKenna - 1992 - Scool and College Publishing.

View all 6 references / Add more references