- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
An Insider’s Perspective on How to Reduce Fraud in the Social Sciences
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 53 (1):6-10 (2025)
Abstract
I will describe how a fraudulent paper developed and offer insights into the institutional changes that are needed. I was a co-author on a paper described as a “clusterfake” due to at least two frauds allegedly occurring in the same paper. I will use my knowledge of behavioral ethics and my experience as a co-author on a fraudulent paper to explore changes that are needed to improve research integrity.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
A Critical Analysis of Falsification as Fraud.La Shun L. Carroll - 2024 - Ethics in Progress 15 (1):174-206.
Responsibility for scientific misconduct in collaborative papers.Gert Helgesson & Stefan Eriksson - 2018 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21 (3):423-430.
Why Universities Should Make Misconduct Reports Public.Ivan Oransky & Adam Marcus - 2025 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 53 (1):59-63.
The Quest for Clarity in Research Integrity: A Conceptual Schema.David Shaw - 2019 - Science and Engineering Ethics 25 (4):1085-1093.
Learning from Failures of Co-owned Firms: Common Ownership and Information Disclosure Fraud.Ziwei Wang, Chunfeng Wang & Zhenming Fang - 2024 - Journal of Business Ethics 195 (1):95-119.
I have been scammed in my qualitative research.Parisa Aslani, Mark F. Harris, Elizabeth Harris, Sabuj Kanti Mistry, Donna Thomas, Kate Lowrie & Carole Bandiera - 2025 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 10 (1).
Perceptions on the Causes of Individual and Fraudulent Co-offending: Views of Forensic Accountants.Jeanette Van Akkeren & Sherrena Buckby - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 146 (2):383-404.
Perceptions on the Causes of Individual and Fraudulent Co-offending: Views of Forensic Accountants.Tobias Gössling & Michael Stefan Aßländer - 2017 - Journal of Business Ethics 146 (2):383-404.
An analytic hierarchy process model to apportion co-author responsibility.Theodore J. Sheskin - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3):555-565.
Bots, scammers, and fraudulent responders: a year of disrupted data collection.A. Dana Ménard, Suzanne McMurphy, Morgan Sterling, Nicholas Armstrong, Oliver Cheek & Storm Balint - 2026 - Ethics and Behavior 36 (3):235-249.
Analytics
Added to PP
2025-03-29
Downloads
61 (#986,640)
6 months
16 (#715,298)
2025-03-29
Downloads
61 (#986,640)
6 months
16 (#715,298)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Fostering Accountability: How Institutions Can Promote Research Integrity with Practical Tools and Knowledge.Julia L. Briskin & C. K. Gunsalus - 2025 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 53 (1):67-73.
Academic Research Integrity Investigations Must be Independent, Fair, and Timely.Matthew Schrag, Kevin Patrick & Elisabeth Bik - 2025 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 53 (1):55-58.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation