Newton and Darwin: Can this marriage be saved?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):91-92 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The insights described by Nevin & Grace may be summarized without reference to the Newtonian concepts they suggest. The metaphor to Newtonian mechanics seems dubious in three ways: (1) extensions seem to lead to paradoxes; (2) many well-known phenomena are ignored; (3) the Newtonian concepts seem difficult to reconcile with the larger framework of evolutionary theory.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Toward a deconstruction of the metaphor of behavioral momentum.Charles P. Shimp - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (1):111-112.
Conformal Invariance of the Newtonian Weyl Tensor.Neil Dewar & James Read - 2020 - Foundations of Physics 50 (11):1418-1425.
Causal fundamentalism in physics.Henrik Zinkernagel - 2009 - In Mauricio Suárez, Mauro Dorato & Miklós Rédei, EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences: Launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association. Dordrecht, Netherland: Springer. pp. 311--322.
Zeno's arrow, Newton's mechanics, and bell's inequalities.Leonard Angel - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (2):161-182.
Evolutionary and Newtonian Forces.Christopher Hitchcock & Joel D. Velasco - 2014 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 1:39-77.
Framework confirmation by Newtonian abduction.Erik Curiel - 2020 - Synthese 198 (Suppl 16):3813-3851.
Must neural mechanisms be Newtonian?Erich Harth - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (4):550-551.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
131 (#342,699)

6 months
18 (#615,045)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references