Counterfactuality in counterintuitive religious concepts

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):731-732 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In sketching a preliminary scientific theory of religion, Atran & Norenzayan (A&N) generally agree with cognitive scientists of religion in the factors that coalesce to form religion. At times they misrepresent, however, the notion of “counterintuitive” concepts as they apply to religious concepts, confusing counterintuitive with counterfactual, category mistakes, and logical contradiction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Agency, religion, and magic.Dan Sperber - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):750-751.
Locating the causes of religious commitment.Harvey Whitehouse - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):752-753.
Religion is neither costly nor beneficial.Ilkka Pyysiäinen - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):746-746.
Future research in cognitive science and religion.Kelly Bulkeley - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):733-734.
Spiritual oneness and the cognitive science of religion.Veronica Campos & Daniel De Luca-Noronha - 2024 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 95 (3):323-338.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
146 (#294,224)

6 months
22 (#466,507)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?