On the evolution of natural laws

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (3):343-370 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

's argumentation in favour of essential invariability of the fundamental laws of nature is critically examined. It is contended that within the realist framework Poincareé's arguments lose their apodictical force. In this sense the assumption of inconstancy of even the fundamental laws of nature is methodologically legitimate.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Explaining the modal force of natural laws.Andreas Bartels - 2018 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9 (1):6.
On Wheeler's notion of “law without law” in physics.David Deutsch - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (6):565-572.
Natural Law in American Revolutionary Thought.Andrew J. Reck - 1977 - Review of Metaphysics 30 (4):686 - 714.
Unexpected a posteriori necessary laws of nature.Alexander Bird - 2005 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (4):533 – 548.
Laws of Nature.Alastair Wilson - 2020 - In The Nature of Contingency: Quantum Physics as Modal Realism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp. 145-171.
Can the fundamental laws of nature be the results of evolution?Abner Shimony - 1999 - In Jeremy Butterfield & Constantine Pagonis, From Physics to Philosophy. Cambridge University Press. pp. 208--223.
The world as one of a kind: Natural necessity and laws of nature.John Bigelow, Brian Ellis & Caroline Lierse - 1992 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 43 (3):371-388.
The fundamental laws of physics can tell the truth.Renat Nugayev - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (1):79 – 87.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
371 (#127,200)

6 months
35 (#242,117)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references