- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Moral theorists
In Ruth Chadwick & Doris Schroeder, Applied ethics: critical concepts in philosophy. New York: Routledge. pp. 1--169 (2002)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Trust and Distrust of Moral Theorists.Annette Baier - 1993 - In Earl Winkler & Jerrold R. Coombs, Applied ethics: a reader. Cambridge [Mass.]: Blackwell.
Review: Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. [REVIEW]D. W. Shoemaker - 2006 - Mind 115 (457):129-135.
Review - Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason.Alexandra Couto - 2006 - Metapsychology Online Reviews 10 (5).
Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason - Edited by Michael Byron.William J. Fitzpatrick - 2007 - Philosophical Books 48 (3):281-283.
Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason.Michael Byron (ed.) - 2004 - New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Satisficing and maximizing: Moral theorists on practical reason, edited by Michael Byron. Cambridge university press, 2004, 245 pages. [REVIEW]Krister Bykvist - 2007 - Economics and Philosophy 23 (2):240-245.
A Critical Analysis of Some of the Limitations on the Scope of Moral Prohibitions Suggested by Two Quasi-Absolutist Moral Theorists.Susan Donna Levine - 1981 - Dissertation, Brown University
Many students of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics recognize the value of comparisons between Aristotle and modern moralists. We are familiar with some of the ways in which reflection on Hume, Kant, Mill, Sidgwick, and more recent moral theorists can throw light on Aristotle. The light may come either from recognition of similarities or from a sharper awareness of differences.“Themes ancient and modern” is a familiar part of the contemporary study of Aristotle that needs no further commendation. [REVIEW]Natural Law Aquinas & Aristotelian Eudaimonism - 2008 - In Richard Kraut, The Blackwell Guide to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Two views of satisficing.Michael Slote - 2004 - In Michael Byron, Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 14--29.
A new defense of satisficing.Michael Weber - 2004 - In Michael Byron, Satisficing and Maximizing: Moral Theorists on Practical Reason. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 77--106.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-26
Downloads
22 (#1,786,184)
6 months
4 (#1,750,773)
2014-01-26
Downloads
22 (#1,786,184)
6 months
4 (#1,750,773)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation