Entrepreneurial Error Does Not Equal Market Failure

Journal of Business Ethics 149 (2):433-441 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Barnett and Block claim that Bagus and Howden support indirectly the concept of market failure. In this paper, we show that maturity mismatching in an unhampered market may imply entrepreneurial error but cannot be considered a market failure. We demonstrate why fractional-reserve banking leads to business cycles even if there is no central bank and why maturity mismatching does not per se lead to clusters of errors in a free market. Finally, in contrast to the examples provided by Barnett and Block, we assure that maturity mismatching does not imply the creation of two incompatible contracts due to the fungible nature of money.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-10

Downloads
111 (#438,291)

6 months
38 (#218,922)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

The ethics of liberty.Murray Newton Rothbard - 1982 - Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
Toward a Reformulation of the Law of Contracts.Williamson M. Evers - 1977 - Journal of Libertarian Studies 1 (1):3-13.
The Continuing Continuum Problem of Deposits and Loans.Philipp Bagus & David Howden - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 106 (3):295-300.

View all 16 references / Add more references