Friendship and commercial societies

Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (3):301-326 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Critics of commercial societies complain that the free-market system of property rights and freedom of contract tends to commodify relationships, thus eroding the bonds of personal and civic friendship. I argue that this thesis rests on a misunderstanding of both markets and friendship. As voluntary, reciprocal relationships, market relationships and friendship share important properties. Like all relations and activities that exercise important human capacities and play an important role in a meaningful life, market relations and activities are essentially structured and supported by ethical norms and, in turn, support these norms. The so-called norms of the market, such as instrumentality and fungibility, come in varying degrees and characterize not only market, but also nonmarket, relationships, including friendship. Furthermore, although market relationships are primarily instrumental, the individuals involved are not. The virtues of markets have their counterparts in friendship, as do their vices. For these and other reasons, market societies are not only not inimical to friendship, they create a more secure matrix for civic and personal friendship, as well as for other important values such as art, science, or philosophy, than any other developed form of society. Key Words: commercial societies • friendship • moral norms • virtues • vices.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

After Philia? Friendship, the Market, and Late Modernity.Lawrence Quill - 2009 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16 (2):32-43.
Yes, Friendship and Love Can Be Bought and Sold.Simone Sommer Degn - 2026 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 43 (2):549-569.
XI—Equality, Friendship, and Politics.Joseph Chan - 2021 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 121 (3):275-298.
Rethinking friendship.Mark Phelan - 2023 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 66 (5):757-772.
Civic Friendship.Mary Healy - 2011 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 30 (3):229-240.
Civic Friendship, Capabilities and Affiliation.Ana Gavran Miloš & Nebojša Zelič - 2024 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 71 (179):53-76.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
785 (#74,177)

6 months
143 (#89,929)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Neera K. Badhwar
University of Oklahoma

Citations of this work

Adam Smith’s Bourgeois Virtues in Competition.Thomas Wells & Johan Graafland - 2012 - Business Ethics Quarterly 22 (2):319-350.
Friendship, markets, and companionate robots for children.Mary Healy - 2023 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 57 (3):661-677.
After Philia? Friendship, the Market, and Late Modernity.Lawrence Quill - 2009 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16 (2):32-43.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Since.Kai von Fintel & Sabine Iatridou - 2019 - In Daniel Altshuler & Jessica Rett, The Semantics of Plurals, Focus, Degrees, and Times: Essays in Honor of Roger Schwarzschild. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 305-333.
Atomism.Charles Taylor - 1979 - In Alkis Kontos, Powers, Possessions and Freedom: Essays in Honour of C.B. Macpherson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. pp. 39-62.
Aristotle on the Forms of Friendship.John M. Cooper - 1977 - Review of Metaphysics 30 (4):619-648.
On civic friendship.Sibyl A. Schwarzenbach - 1996 - Ethics 107 (1):97-128.

View all 11 references / Add more references