The Dialectics of Objectivity

Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (3):339-368 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper develops under-recognized connections between moderate historicist methodology and character (or virtue) epistemology, and goes on to argue that their combination supports a “dialectical” conception of objectivity. Considerations stemming from underdetermination problems motivate our claim that historicism requires agent-focused rather than merely belief-focused epistemology; embracing this point helps historicists avoid the charge of relativism. Considerations stemming from the genealogy of epistemic virtue concepts motivate our claim that character epistemologies are strengthened by moderate historicism about the epistemic virtues and values at work in communities of inquiry; embracing this point helps character epistemologists avoid the charge of objectivism.

Other Versions

No versions found

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-12

Downloads
2,813 (#7,857)

6 months
295 (#23,151)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Guy Axtell
Radford University

References found in this work

Shame and Necessity.Bernard Williams - 1993 - Apeiron 27 (1):45-76.
Understanding and the facts.Catherine Elgin - 2007 - Philosophical Studies 132 (1):33 - 42.
The Logic of the History of Ideas.Mark Bevir - 1999 - Cambridge University Press.
Pierre Duhem’s virtue epistemology.David J. Stump - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1):149-159.

View all 10 references / Add more references