Medicine's duty to treat pandemic illness: Solidarity and vulnerability

Hastings Center Report 39 (1):40-48 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most accounts of why physicians have a duty to treat patients during a pandemic look to the special ethical standards of the medical profession. An adequate account must be deeper and broader: it must set the professional duty alongside other individual commitments and broader social values.

Other Versions

original Brody, Howard; Avery, Eric N. (2009) "Medicine's Duty to Treat Pandemic Illness: Solidarity and Vulnerability". Hastings Center Report 39(1):40-48

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Duty to Treat or Right to Refuse?Norman Daniels - 1991 - Hastings Center Report 21 (2):36-46.
Justification and Limitations of the Duty to Treat.Gustavo Ortiz-Millán - 2025 - -The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine 50 (5):354-369.
SARS and the Duty to Treat: Remember AIDS?Tom Tomlinson - 2004 - Hastings Center Report 34 (1):4.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-09-06

Downloads
5 (#2,220,753)

6 months
2 (#1,982,468)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 1971 - Oxford,: Harvard University Press. Edited by Steven M. Cahn.
A short history of medical ethics.Albert R. Jonsen - 2000 - New York: Oxford University press.

View all 9 references / Add more references