Unfair to facts

In John Langshaw Austin, [no title]. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press (1961)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

‘Unfair to Facts’ is a follow-up on Ch. 5, addressing objections Peter Strawson raised against Austin’s view of truth as a description of the conditions that must be satisfied if we are to say of a statement that it is true. Austin addresses the objection that his description of these conditions is due to a misunderstanding about the use of ‘fact’, arguing, against Strawson, that facts are not pseudo-entities and that the notion of ‘fitting the facts’ is not a useless notion.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On not worshipping facts.J. R. Lucas - 1958 - Philosophical Quarterly 8 (31):144-156.
Ethical Objections to Fairtrade.Peter Griffiths - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 105 (3):357-373.
When Is Birth Unfair to the Child?Bonnie Steinbock & Ron McClamrock - 1994 - Hastings Center Report 24 (6):15-21.
Being Positive About Negative Facts.Mark Jago & Stephen Barker - 2012 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (1):117-138.
On the redress of grievances.J. M. Alexander - 2013 - Analysis 73 (2):228-230.
The force and fairness of blame.Pamela Hieronymi - 2004 - Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):115–148.
Can there be brute, contingent moral facts.John H. Dreher - 2002 - Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):23-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-07-15

Downloads
166 (#249,694)

6 months
39 (#210,789)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references