- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Acknowledgment to Reviewers of Volume 7
Constructivist Foundations 7 (3):242-242 (2012)
Abstract
The quality of a journal can only be maintained by thoughtful, careful, and constructive reviewing of both board members and external reviewers. We thank the following people for taking the time to review manuscripts submitted to Constructivist Foundations.Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Characteristics of Peer Review Reports: Editor-Suggested Versus Author-Suggested Reviewers.Jovan Shopovski, Cezary Bolek & Monika Bolek - 2020 - Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (2):709-726.
Each year Cognition is obliged to request the help of a certain number of guest reviewers who assist in the assessment of manuscripts. Without their cooperation the journal would not be able to maintain its high standards. We are happy to be able to thank the following people for their help in refereeing manuscripts during 1991.Terry Kit-Fong Au, William Badecker, Irving Biderman, Manfred Bierwisch, Paul Bloom, Mark Bornstein, Brian Byrne, Ruth Byrne, Patricia Cheng & Herbert H. Clark - 1992 - Cognition 43:195.
Each year@ ogn&~ n is obliged to request the help of a certain number of guest reviewers who assist in the assessment of manuscripts. Without their cooperation the journal would not be able to maintain its high standards. We are happy to be able to thank the following people for their help in refereeing manuscripts during 1989.J. Alegria, W. Badecker, M. Bar-Hillel, D. Bekerian, E. Bisiach, P. Bloom, K. Bock, G. Boolos, V. Bruce & B. Byrne - 1990 - Cognition 35:101.
Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review.Pertti Saloheimo, Mauri Marttunen, Terttu Harju, Noora Järvinen, Joonas Laajava & Piitu Parmanne - 2023 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 8 (1).
ear Cognition is oblige to request the help of a certain number of guest reviewers who assist in the assessment of manuscripts. cooperation the journal would not be able to maintain its high are happy to be able to thank the following people for their help in refereeing manuscripts during 1988.J. Have11, A. Galaburda, W. Gallistel, E. Stabler, A. Treisman & S. Ullman - 1989 - Cognition 31:291.
Analytics
Added to PP
2015-02-02
Downloads
0
6 months
0
2015-02-02
Downloads
0
6 months
0
Historical graph of downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation