The Ethical Significance of Shame: Insights of Aristotle and Xunzi

Philosophy East and West 53 (2):147-202 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

A constructive interpretation of the Confucian conception of shame is offered here. Xunzi's discussion is considered the locus classicus of the Confucian conception of shame as contrasted with honor. In order to show his conception as an articulation and development of the more inchoate attitudes of Confucius and Mencius, and excursion is made into the Lunyu and the Mengzi. Aristotle's conception of shame is used as a sort of catalyst, an opening for appreciating Xunzi's complementary insights.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Aristotle and Confucius on the Socioeconomics of Shame.Thorian R. Harris - 2014 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 13 (3):323-342.
Xunzi's Vision of Society: Harmony by Justice.Heiner Roetz - 2015 - In Julia Tao, Anthony B. L. Cheung, Martin Painter & Chenyang Li, Governance for Harmony in Asia and Beyond. Routledge. pp. 315-328.
Guarding moral boundaries: Shame in early confucianism.Jane Geaney - 2004 - Philosophy East and West 54 (2):113-142.
Moral Psychology of Confucian Shame: Shame of Shamelessness.Bongrae Seok - 2017 - Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Shame and the Internalized Other.Alba Montes Sánchez - 2015 - Etica E Politica 1 (XVII):181-200.
An African Ethics of Shame.John Sodiq Sanni & Frank Aragbonfoh Abumere - 2026 - Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory 73 (186):1-20.
Shame and the Confucian Idea of Yi.Yinghua Lu - 2018 - International Philosophical Quarterly 58 (1):5-18.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
269 (#156,513)

6 months
32 (#284,326)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?