Parmenides’ Doxa and the Norms of Inquiry: A Case Study of the Fragments on Astronomy

In Colin C. Smith, Inquiring into being: essays on Parmenides. Albany: State University of New York Press (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Parmenides’ Doxa (B8.51-B19) outlines a dualistic cosmology underlying the changing, multifarious world of sense experience. Characterized by the goddess as “untrustworthy” and “deceptive”, the entities described in this section of text lack the features of what-is, as outlined in the Truth (B2-B8.20). For this reason and others, much of the scholarly sentiment on the Doxa has traditionally disparaged its philosophical value. There is, however, an emerging appreciation for the scientific ingenuity evidenced by its contents, motivating the possibility of an interpretation that treats this part of the poem as philosophically interesting in its own right. In this chapter, I offer one such interpretation by arguing that the poem as a whole advances a notion of inquiry as a goal-directed activity governed by domain-specific norms that are dictated by features of the objects proper to different kinds of inquiry. I contrast the purely “rationalist” norms that govern inquiry into what-is in the Truth with the contents of the Doxa (focusing in particular on the astronomy fragments in B10, B14, and B15) which appear to be the results of rigorous empirical investigation into the natural world. I suggest that error and deception are not inherent features of this kind of inquiry. Rather, they are the consequences of mistaking inquiry in one domain for inquiry in a different domain and thereby violating the zetetic principles implicit in the poem. On my reading, far from serving as a mere dialectical exercise, a warning, or a ‘negative ideal model’ outlining the illusory world of appearances, the Doxa demonstrates that the sensible world is a legitimate domain of inquiry that can contribute positively to the inquirer’s body of knowledge. My reading challenges traditional interpretations of the relationship between the Truth and the Doxa, and suggests that Parmenides is both a serious proponent of natural philosophy and a critic of the Ionian method which confuses inquiry into the sensible world for inquiry into what-is.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Colloquium 1 Commentary on Cherubin.Yale Weiss - 2018 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 33 (1):22-26.
Parmenides and the Origin of Metaphysics.Matthew Evans - 2026 - New York, NY United States of America (the): Oxford University Press.
Colloquium 1 Parmenides, Liars, and Mortal Incompleteness.Rose Cherubin - 2018 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 33 (1):1-21.
Parmenides' Theistic Metaphysics.Jeremy C. DeLong - 2016 - Dissertation, University of Kansas
1C1The Problem of the Doxa.Matthew Evans - 2026 - In Parmenides and the Origin of Metaphysics. New York, NY United States of America (the): Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-01-26

Downloads
54 (#1,105,971)

6 months
38 (#226,522)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Sosseh Assaturian
University of Washington

Citations of this work

The Zetetic.Arianna Falbo - 2025 - In Kurt Sylvan, Jonathan Dancy, Ernest Sosa & Matthias Steup, A Companion to Epistemology, 2 Volume Set. Wiley-Blackwell.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Eleatic Questions.G. E. L. Owen - 1960 - Classical Quarterly 10 (1):84-.
The Thesis of Parmenides.Charles H. Kahn - 1969 - Review of Metaphysics 22 (4):700 - 724.

Add more references