Bounded forcing axioms and the continuum

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 109 (3):179-203 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We show that bounded forcing axioms are consistent with the existence of -gaps and thus do not imply the Open Coloring Axiom. They are also consistent with Jensen's combinatorial principles for L at the level ω2, and therefore with the existence of an ω2-Suslin tree. We also show that the axiom we call BMM3 implies 21=2, as well as a stationary reflection principle which has many of the consequences of Martin's Maximum for objects of size 2. Finally, we give an example of a so-called boldface bounded forcing axiom implying 20=2.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A maximal bounded forcing axiom.David Asperó - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):130-142.
Bounded forcing axioms as principles of generic absoluteness.Joan Bagaria - 2000 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 39 (6):393-401.
Projective Well-Orderings and Bounded Forcing Axioms.Andrés Eduardo Caicedo - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (2):557-572.
Forcing Indestructibility of Set-Theoretic Axioms.Bernhard König - 2007 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 72 (1):349-360.
More forcing notions imply diamond.Andrzej Rosłanowski & Saharon Shelah - 1996 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 35 (5-6):299-313.
Distributive proper forcing axiom and cardinal invariants.Huiling Zhu - 2013 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 52 (5-6):497-506.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
74 (#790,762)

6 months
5 (#1,612,624)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

David Aspero
University of East Anglia

Citations of this work

On a convenient property about $${[\gamma]^{\aleph_0}}$$.David Asperó - 2009 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (7):653-677.

Add more citations