Logics of Conversation

Cambridge University Press (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

People often mean more than they say. Grammar on its own is typically insufficient for determining the full meaning of an utterance; the assumption that the discourse is coherent or 'makes sense' has an important role to play in determining meaning as well. Logics of Conversation presents a dynamic semantic framework called Segmented Discourse Representation Theory, or SDRT, where this interaction between discourse coherence and discourse interpretation is explored in a logically precise manner. Combining ideas from dynamic semantics, commonsense reasoning and speech act theory, SDRT uses its analysis of rhetorical relations to capture intuitively compelling implicatures. It provides a computable method for constructing these logical forms and is one of the most formally precise and linguistically grounded accounts of discourse interpretation currently available. The book will be of interest to researchers and students in linguistics and in philosophy of language.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The natural language conjunction and.Isabel Gómez Txurruka - 2003 - Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (3):255-285.
The Semantics and Pragmatics of Presupposition.Alex Lascarides - 1998 - Journal of Semantics 15 (3):239-300.
On denying presuppositions.Lenny Clapp - 2016 - Synthese 194 (6):1841-1900.
Normativity in Language and Law.Alex Silk - 2019 - In Toh Kevin, Plunkett David & Shapiro Scott, Dimensions of Normativity: New Essays on Metaethics and Jurisprudence. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 287-313.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-02

Downloads
220 (#183,844)

6 months
29 (#327,597)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Asher
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

Citations of this work

Insinuation, Common Ground, and the Conversational Record.Elisabeth Camp - 2018 - In Daniel Fogal, Daniel W. Harris & Matt Moss, New Work on Speech Acts. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 40–66.
Why maps are not propositional.Elisabeth Camp - 2018 - In Alex Grzankowski & Michelle Montague, Non-Propositional Intentionality. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 19-45.
A Preference Semantics for Imperatives.William B. Starr - 2020 - Semantics and Pragmatics 20.

View all 221 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references