What's So Special about the Human Genome?

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):422-424 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Glenn McGee argues that the time is now for debating the morality of patenting human genes. In one sense he is surely right. While thousands of patents have been issued or are pending on many gene sequences, public policy with respect to ownership of the human genome is still far from settled. So a debate about the ethics of patenting genes is, if nothing else, timely. In another sense however, Professor McGee is wrong.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Gene Patents—A Pharmaceutical Perspective.Jack L. Tribble - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):429-432.
Human Gene Patents and Human Dignity.Stephanie H. To - 2015 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (2):265-285.
Ethics and the patenting of human genes.Annabelle Lever - 2001 - Journal of Philosophy, Science and Law 1:31-46.
Should Human Genes Be Patented?David K. Chan - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (2):30-36.
Disease Genes Are Not Patentable: A Rebuttal of McGee.Jon F. Merz & Mildred K. Cho - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):425-428.
Legal Dimensions in Gene Ownership.David Koepsell - 2015 - In Michael Boylan, Who Owns You? Wiley. pp. 83–100.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
137 (#320,651)

6 months
4 (#1,750,773)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

Gene Patents Can Be Ethical.Glenn Mcgee - 1998 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (4):417-421.

Add more references