- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Conflict-free and conflict-tolerant semantics for constrained argumentation frameworks
Journal of Applied Logic 13 (4):582-604 (2015)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Conflict-tolerant semantics for argumentation frameworks.Ofer Arieli - 2012 - In Luis Farinas del Cerro, Andreas Herzig & Jerome Mengin, Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Springer. pp. 28--40.
Sequent-based logical argumentation.Ofer Arieli & Christian Straßer - 2015 - Argument and Computation 6 (1):73-99.
Uniate /vs./ Orthodox: What Lays behind the Conflict? A conflict analysis.Delia Despina Dumitrica - 2002 - Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 1 (3):99-114.
A conflict case approach to business ethics.Johannes Brinkmann & Knut J. Ims - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):123-136.
Analytics
Added to PP
2016-06-30
Downloads
51 (#1,170,608)
6 months
9 (#1,205,134)
2016-06-30
Downloads
51 (#1,170,608)
6 months
9 (#1,205,134)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: An incremental approach.Gianvincenzo Alfano, Andrea Cohen, Sebastian Gottifredi, Sergio Greco, Francesco Parisi & Guillermo R. Simari - 2024 - Artificial Intelligence 333 (C):104159.
Abstract argumentation frameworks with strong and weak constraints.Gianvincenzo Alfano, Sergio Greco, Domenico Mandaglio, Francesco Parisi & Irina Trubitsyna - 2024 - Artificial Intelligence 336 (C):104205.
A principle-based robustness analysis of admissibility-based argumentation semantics.Tjitze Rienstra, Chiaki Sakama, Leendert van der Torre & Beishui Liao - 2020 - Argument and Computation 11 (3):305-339.
Constraints and lifting-based (conditional) preferences in abstract argumentation.Gianvincenzo Alfano, Sergio Greco, Francesco Parisi & Irina Trubitsyna - 2025 - Artificial Intelligence 349 (C):104437.
On generalized notions of consistency and reinstatement and their preservation in formal argumentation.Pietro Baroni, Federico Cerutti & Massimiliano Giacomin - 2024 - Artificial Intelligence 336 (C):104202.
References found in this work
On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games.Phan Minh Dung - 1995 - Artificial Intelligence 77 (2):321-357.
On the theory of inconsistent formal systems.Newton C. A. Costa - 1972 - Recife: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Instituto de Matemática.
On the theory of inconsistent formal systems.Newton da Costa - 1974 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (4):497-510.
Natural 3-valued logics—characterization and proof theory.Arnon Avron - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (1):276-294.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation