Abstract

Interpretations of the conflict between Galileo and the Roman Curia are many and various. A few commentators profess to see no great issues at stake, and are inclined to dismiss the Trial of 1633 as merely the outcome of personal jealousies and local intrigues. Others see the Trial as damning evidence for the Church’s rooted hostility to scientific enquiry. Others again find no evidence of a conflict between the Church and science, and see the Trial as one more instance of a routine administrative authority frowning on the would-be innovator: something which is likely to happen in any field where there is an official ‘establishment’.