- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
How to Destroy an Epistemic Game: Epistemic Triflers, Cheats and Spoilsports
Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 13 (8):12-19 (2024)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Triflers, cheats, and spoilsports.Bernard Suits - 1978 - In The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia. Peterborough, ON: Broadview Press. pp. 44-51.
On Anticipatory Epistemic Injustice: Replies to Eric Bayruns García and Trystan S. Goetze.Ji-Young Lee - 2021 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective.
Four Asymmetries Between Moral and Epistemic Trustworthiness.Susann Wagenknecht - 2014 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 3 (6):82-86.
Rejected Experts and the Foundations of Epistemic Authority: A Reply to Censon.Charles Lassiter - 2025 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 14 (8):54-60.
Considering Purposeful Epistemology: On Starting Over. Review of Epistemic Evaluation: Purposeful Epistemology. [REVIEW]Mark D. West - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (9):19-33.
Developing Community Epistemic Capacities.Ian Werkheiser - 2016 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 5 (2):97-101.
Critical Reply to'Culpability for Epistemic Injustice: Deontic or Aretetic'by Wayne Riggs.D. A. Coady - 2012 - Social Epistemology: Review and Reply Collective 1 (5):3-6.
Epistemic Evaluations: Consequences, Costs and Benefits.Peter J. Graham, Megan Stotts, Zachary Bachman & Meredith McFadden - 2015 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 4 (4):7-13.
Why There is No Redemption: A Reply to Békefi.János Tőzsér - 2025 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 14 (1):70-80.
A Review of Linda Zagzebski's Epistemic Authority.Jonathan Matheson, Valerie Joly Chock, Jensen Alex & Kyle Mallard - 2017 - Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 6 (10):56-59.
Analytics
Added to PP
2024-08-08
Downloads
796 (#72,953)
6 months
281 (#28,723)
2024-08-08
Downloads
796 (#72,953)
6 months
281 (#28,723)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
References found in this work
Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues From Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming.Naomi Oreskes & Erik M. Conway - 2010 - Bloomsbury Press.
Playfulness versus epistemic traps.C. Thi Nguyen - 2022 - In Mark Alfano, Jeroen De Ridder & Colin Klein, Social Virtue Epistemology. Routledge.
Ethics and the Global Financial Crisis: Why Incompetence is Worse Than Greed.Boudewijn de Bruin - 2015 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation