The premature breech: caesarean section or trial of labour?

Journal of Medical Ethics 14 (1):18-24 (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Obstetricians face difficult decisions when the interests of fetus and mother conflict. An example is the problem of choosing the delivery method when labour begins prematurely and the fetus is breech. Vaginal delivery involves risks for the breech fetus of brain damage or death caused by umbilical cord compression and head entrapment. Caesarean section might avoid these dangers but involves risks for the mother, including infection, haemorrhage and even death in a small percentage of cases. If a caesarean section is performed the infant might die anyway, due to complications of prematurity. Thus, decisions about delivery method involve balancing the risks to mother and fetus. Uncertainty about the frequency of fetal injuries in vaginal breech deliveries adds to the difficulty of these decisions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The political philosophy of New Labour.Matt Beech - 2006 - New York: Distributed in the U.S. by Palgrave Macmillan.
Exploitation via Labour Power in Marx.Henry Laycock - 1999 - The Journal of Ethics 3 (2):121--131.
More on exploitation and the labour theory of value.G. A. Cohen - 1983 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (3):309 – 331.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-13

Downloads
90 (#611,010)

6 months
25 (#381,489)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

The moral status of the near-term fetus.C. Strong & G. Anderson - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (1):25-27.
Editor's reply.Raanan Gillon - 1989 - Journal of Medical Ethics 15 (1):26-27.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references