Epistemic dependence in interdisciplinary groups

Synthese 190 (11):1881-1898 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In interdisciplinary research scientists have to share and integrate knowledge between people and across disciplinary boundaries. An important issue for philosophy of science is to understand how scientists who work in these kinds of environments exchange knowledge and develop new concepts and theories across diverging fields. There is a substantial literature within social epistemology that discusses the social aspects of scientific knowledge, but so far few attempts have been made to apply these resources to the analysis of interdisciplinary science. Further, much of the existing work either ignores the issue of differences in background knowledge, or it focuses explicitly on conflicting background knowledge. In this paper we provide an analysis of the interplay between epistemic dependence between individual experts with different areas of expertise. We analyze the cooperative activity they engage in when participating in interdisciplinary research in a group, and we compare our findings with those of other studies in interdisciplinary research.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

We should redefine scientific expertise: an extended virtue account.Duygu Uygun Tunç - 2022 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 12 (4):1-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-13

Downloads
268 (#156,900)

6 months
49 (#174,220)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Citations of this work

Group Inquiry.Joshua Habgood-Coote - 2022 - Erkenntnis 87 (3):1099-1123.
Collaboration, interdisciplinarity, and the epistemology of contemporary science.Hanne Andersen - 2016 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:1-10.
The Epistemic Value of Expert Autonomy.Finnur Dellsén - 2020 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 100 (2):344-361.

View all 61 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Experts: Which ones should you trust?Alvin I. Goldman - 2001 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1):85-110.
Epistemic dependence.John Hardwig - 1985 - Journal of Philosophy 82 (7):335-349.
Shared cooperative activity.Michael E. Bratman - 1992 - Philosophical Review 101 (2):327-341.
The Disunity of science: boundaries, contexts, and power.Peter Louis Galison & David J. Stump (eds.) - 1996 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

View all 37 references / Add more references