- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Dissensus in Science as a Fact and as a Norm
In Hanne Andersen, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao J. Gonzalez, Thomas Uebel & Gregory Wheeler, New Challenges to Philosophy of Science. Springer Verlag. pp. 493--506 (2013)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
My notes
Similar books and articles
Why Did Weyl Think that Dedekind’s Norm of Belief in Mathematics is Perverse?Iulian D. Toader - 2016 - In Sorin Costreie, Early Analytic Philosophy – New Perspectives on the Tradition. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
Social Sciences (TRANSLATION from French, 2003. "L'ordre humain" by Daniel Andler).Francois-Igor Pris - manuscript
Conclusion: New Norms of Science.Rani Lill Anjum & Stephen Mumford - 2018 - In Rani Lill Anjum & Stephen Mumford, Causation in Science and the Methods of Scientific Discovery. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 245-254.
Daniel Andler, Intelligence artificielle, intelligence humaine : la double énigme, Paris, Gallimard, nrf essais, 2023, 432 p. [REVIEW]Jean-Michel Roy - 2025 - Philosophie 164 (1):93-95.
Consensus and Dissensus in Science.Robert Ackermann - 1986 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1986:99-105.
Norm and Fact in Social Science.T. V. Smith - 1936 - In Actes du huitième Congrès International de Philosophie. pp. 266-283.
Daniel Andler, Anne Fagot-Largeault et Bertrand Saint-Cernin, Philosophie des sciences I et II, Paris, Gallimard, collection Folio Essais, 2002, 1334 pages.Daniel Andler, Anne Fagot-Largeault et Bertrand Saint-Cernin, Philosophie des sciences I et II, Paris, Gallimard, collection Folio Essais, 2002, 1334 pages. [REVIEW]Maurice Gagnon - 2004 - Philosophiques 31 (1):275-287.
Consensus, Dissensus, and Democracy: What Is at Stake in Feminist Science Studies?Margret Grebowicz - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (5):989-1000.
Daniel Andler, Intelligence artificielle, intelligence humaine : la double énigme, Paris, Gallimard, « NRF Essais », 2023, 434 p.Éloïse Boisseau - 2024 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 122 (2):284-285.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-28
Downloads
46 (#1,255,219)
6 months
5 (#1,642,513)
2014-01-28
Downloads
46 (#1,255,219)
6 months
5 (#1,642,513)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Social Epistemology of Consensus and Dissent.Boaz Miller - 2019 - In Miranda Fricker, Peter Graham, David Henderson & Nikolaj Jang Pedersen, The Routledge Handbook of Social Epistemology. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 228-237.
References found in this work
Making things happen: a theory of causal explanation.James Woodward - 2003 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Freedom of the will and the concept of a person.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1971 - Journal of Philosophy 68 (1):5-20.
Logical foundations of probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]: Chicago University of Chicago Press.
Try MATCHA Writer if you're interested in citing directly from PhilPapers and certifying your authorship.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation