Autoeroticism: Rethinking Self-Love with Derrida and Irigaray

PhaenEx 12 (1):53-70 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Eros is often considered to be a desire or inclination for what is irreducibly other to the self. This view is particularly prominent among philosophers who reject a “fusion” model of erotic love in favor of one that foregrounds the difference between lovers. Drawing from this “difference” model, I argue in this essay that autoeroticism is a genuine form of Eros, even when Eros is understood to involve irreducible alterity. I claim that the autoerotic act is not adequately captured by traditional views of masturbation, where it is seen as distinct from the erotic encounter with another being. Instead, I employ Derrida and Irigaray to argue that the autoerotic act is auto-hetero-erotic, which depends on a view of the self as self-othering and heterogeneous.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-03

Downloads
149 (#286,281)

6 months
19 (#574,282)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ellie Anderson
Pomona College

Citations of this work

A Phenomenological Approach to Sexual Consent.Ellie Anderson - 2022 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 8 (2).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Of grammatology.Jacques Derrida - 1976 - Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Edited by Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak.
The metaphysics of morals.Immanuel Kant - 1996 - New York: Cambridge University Press. Edited by Mary J. Gregor.
Identity and difference.Martin Heidegger - 1969 - New York,: Harper & Row. Edited by Martin Heidegger.
Witnessing: Beyond Recognition.Kelly Oliver - 2001 - Univ Of Minnesota Press.

View all 16 references / Add more references