Musical Ontology: Works, Versions, and Lineages

British Journal of Aesthetics 64 (4):445-459 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, I develop a novel account of musical works according which they are situated heir lines, consisting of actual and possible work-versions that are situated in specific musical-historical contexts. And I argue that this account offers a better explanation of three core phonenomena - musical multiplicity, musical flexibility, and musical audibility - than its competitors. Finally, I introduce the broader category of musical lineages - sequences of work-versions each of which has evolved in certain ways from its predecessors - and argue that musical works can be viewed as lineages that are initiated by the requisite sorts of compositional intentions and whose constituent work-versions must satisfy standards of similarity from their original contexts of composition.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-05-16

Downloads
109 (#450,538)

6 months
34 (#251,266)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Alward
University of Saskatchewan

Citations of this work

Musical Mereology.Alejandro Di Rienzo - 2026 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 107 (2):58-73.
A Critique of the Idea of Literary and Musical Works.Anders Pettersson - 2026 - British Journal of Aesthetics 66 (2):295-311.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Critica 17 (49):69-71.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.
What a musical work is.Jerrold Levinson - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (1):5-28.
Why can’t I change Bruckner’s Eighth Symphony?David Friedell - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (3):805-824.
Artworks as historical individuals.Guy Rohrbaugh - 2003 - European Journal of Philosophy 11 (2):177–205.

View all 19 references / Add more references